Shop More Submit  Join Login
×




Details

Submitted on
October 19, 2010
Resolution
576×360
File Size
1.5 MB
Length
24s
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
1,734
Favourites
13 (who?)
Comments
34
Downloads
34
×
:iconhaffri:
haffri Featured By Owner Nov 17, 2010
@00:24I agree, definitely, I was originally going to make Timmy float around a bit after falling into the water, and bed should really shake a bit more, and there should be more delay on Timmy's hair in the water, and many more, but I just couldn't be bothered. I didn't want to produce amazing animation, I wanted to make fun of this film, and I spent a few weeks animating less than 5 seconds. I just wanted it to be good enough to convey the message, not amazing.

Aaaand, I don't think I possess skills to make it amazing, and to imitate professional animators' style anyway.
Reply
:iconhaffri:
haffri Featured By Owner Nov 19, 2010
Probably.
Reply
Wait for it...



[Okay, just in case- this is the original The Secret of NIMH footage except from only about 5 seconds of animation added by me. Since, you know, somebody could think I made the whole thing. Surely.]

I think you should watch the film to appreciate the video and the video's title in its whole glory.

The sound is gone. I couldn't find any decent copy with English dubbing, I found one French version though, and when I was all excited, after rendering I realised there's no sound anyway.
Aaand I'm afraid I left a bit too much original footage after the cut.
Whatever. That's not the point.

That's not the point. I learned that from Don Bluth.

Boy, was that movie dumb. And yet it made me produce what is perhaps the most elaborate piece of fanart I'm ever going to make.
And- that's funny on its own- it's probably the most finished animation I have done in my life.
But Timmy is probably my favourite character in this movie- he doesn't say anything and appears in the film for some 10 minutes at best, so he is the last one to blame.

Thank you :iconeggheadcheesybird: and :iconkezzaln:

I do not own those characters, and I do not claim any copyright towards the authentic footage which is (c) Don Bluth/Aurora, I only made the small bit of animation which I'm sure Don Bluth and film producers would be glad not to own.


The Secret of NIMH, the characters, original film artwork and footage (c) Don Bluth/Aurora
Add a Comment:
 
:icondobergirl102:
dobergirl102 Featured By Owner Apr 30, 2011
I'm impressed. I thought the animation of Timmy was great and fit well into the rest of the film. The fall from the bed was very nice and fluid.
And wow, I thought I was the only one who thought "Secret of NIMH" was dumb and full of holes. The mystical elements were unexplained and had no point, there was too much screentime wasted on comic relief, and it had the worst deus ex machina ending I have ever seen. Seriously, every time I see Brisby glowing with all of those rats bowing to her like she's suddenly some sort of messiah, I burst out laughing. And that ending was ridiculously happy. There is no way any of those kids, let alone Timmy and the shrew, would have survived. And then at the end we see the the interior of the house (what we can see through the window) isn't even dirty despite having just been filled up with mud.
Thank you so much for making this!
Reply
:iconhaffri:
haffri Featured By Owner Jun 14, 2011
Haha. Thank you, you are welcome, and then THANK YOU SO MUCH for agreeing. I was called dumbass by someone here in the comments because I said that this movie was dumb. The irony. But I feel safer now knowing there is more of us! :) Haha. Thank you.
Reply
:iconshmuziiq:
shmuziiQ Featured By Owner Nov 24, 2010
The whole point of the writers not giving you a reason or an explanation of the magic of the stone…was to make you think and interpret it for yourself. Not to criticize it (the fact that you said it lacks some logic…or whatever you said, is ridiculous). It is a movie. An animated movie. As much hidden meaning and symbolism as it has...people such as yourself just aren’t meant to dive too deep into it- because you over analyze it (and not logically). Take it for what it is. And by "making fun" of this movie...I think you’ve made yourself look like dumbass. The End.
Reply
:iconeggheadcheesybird:
EggHeadCheesyBird Featured By Owner Dec 8, 2010   Digital Artist
Of course it wasn't MADE to be criticized. What argument is that?

Imagine if directors said that after screenings "No no, guys the point wasn't to think my symbolism was dumb, it was to think I am handsome... and deserve Oscars!"
Critics: "Oohhhhh!!"
Reply
:iconshmuziiq:
shmuziiQ Featured By Owner Nov 24, 2010
its at the end of the movie.timmy asks something along the lines of "Momma I'm tired of being in bed. I wanna get up".i find it stupid when someone criticizes something when they havent even watched it or have no idea what theyre talking about.
Reply
:iconhaffri:
haffri Featured By Owner Nov 24, 2010
Oh, that. I remember them now. I still don't see how is that relevant.

(I'm going to reply to both comments in one reply, because I feel like the issues in your comments are related enough.)

I have watched this film. And now I am criticizing it because I was bored after the first bit of the film, and because it didn't make much sense to me. I think I have the right to be bored by a film or simply not like it and to say that openly. Also, I have the right to be wrong, just like everybody. And I don't mind peaceful questioning of my opinions and discussion about why I might be wrong, but I don't like being attacked because you think I'm an idiot, or because you feel strong emotional bond with this film, or whatever your motivation might be.

To make things clear, if they aren't clear yet, I don't see anything wrong with liking this film, and I don't think people who like it are idiots. One of my friends likes it a lot. Some people I don't know personally, but respect them a lot, like this film. But I do see something wrong with people who don't give me the right to have a different opinion, who get defensive and aggressive when I do have one, and who insult me for that, or get reasonably close to the borders of insult, instead of politely explain to me what is their problem with what I said. It's not like I expressed any harmful, offensive views, I made a joke about imaginary characters in a work of fiction, and I expressed negative views on a film. None of the things I referred to can be harmed. I didn't say "burn every copy of this film" and didn't limit the right of free speech or anyone's right for creativity and creative work. I said that I didn't enjoy this film and I don't consider it a good film. I didn't attack anyone either, except the film itself, but I don't see anything immoral about attacking a work of art with nothing but a negative opinion.

I have the right to question the logic in any film if I see the reason for it to be questioned. If something isn't logical, it's not a properly finished work of fiction. Of course good film (or any other narrative) isn't about logic, but logic is an element of a good film. Tht's the difficult part. Not coming up with nice metaphores- that's the fun part. But once you have all the elements, they have to make sense together. When you make a film which is based on real life in any way, you have to apply some real life rules- you won't make your character randomly jump back and forth in time (unless the film is actually about time travel, of course) and you won't make them do things irrelevant to main plot and then at the end they suddenly fix all the problems, without any explaining how are those things related. Making a film is also creating a logic, or suggesting that it is the same logic we see every day. And once you do that, you have to stick to it. Logic is important. Not the most important, but it is important and spending some time on fixing issues with logic in a film shows some respect for the audience.
When you read a book, you expect to not stumble upon any grammar or orthographic mistakes, even though that's not what the book is about. You wouldn't get a very good opinion about the author and publishing house, even if the story is great.

I didn't spend hours trying to figure out the mistakes in the film, too. It just all occurred to me and my friends when we were watching it, without too much analysis. It was natural reaction to the events in the film on our side, however I don't deny anybody the right to not look at this film in that way.

Also, questioning the nature and value of things which are happening around or being told to you is an important part of the process of learning, and is natural to everybody.

(I don't want it to seem, in the comment above, that I think I know what you, YOU would decide. I was using "you" as "people", "everybody". That always confuses me in English, and I feel like if I was misunderstood, it could cause another unnecessary outburst of aggressive defence.)

I don't think I made a dumbass out of myself. The animation was just a joke and it was you who took it all very seriously, and the comment was just an expression of my views and it was you who took it so personally. I still like the joke and I still have the same opinion about the film. I had some fun, and I don't see why not let people have fun if they are not harming anybody, even if you think they are idiots. It was just supposed to be fun for people who agree with me, and to be ignored by people who don't. Or, certainly, being discussed in a constructive way.
And, well, if you think I'm an idiot, I don't see what's the problem with me just being a harmless, happy idiot not getting in your way. It's not like I made you watch this or tried to force my views on you.

I don't know what made you think that calling me a dumbass would make me change my mind about the film or this argument. And I'm wondering if "The End" was a patronising way of you proving your maturity and dominance in the discussion. I might be wrong, but I feel like you failed. Badly.
Reply
:iconmloyangdrawlo:
MloyangDrawlo Featured By Owner Oct 31, 2010  Student
@00:24I like your part but i think what makes it not fit into the original is that it's a bit too fluid as :devshmuziikQ: said, but also too static at the end, when the bubbles appear. Maybe you should have made the body and the bed move a bit more after timmy's falling, to fit with the chaotic atmosphere of the original one.
great style anyway :)
Reply
:iconhaffri:
haffri Featured By Owner Nov 17, 2010
@00:24I agree, definitely, I was originally going to make Timmy float around a bit after falling into the water, and bed should really shake a bit more, and there should be more delay on Timmy's hair in the water, and many more, but I just couldn't be bothered. I didn't want to produce amazing animation, I wanted to make fun of this film, and I spent a few weeks animating less than 5 seconds. I just wanted it to be good enough to convey the message, not amazing.

Aaaand, I don't think I possess skills to make it amazing, and to imitate professional animators' style anyway.
Reply
:iconsteinlo:
steinlo Featured By Owner Oct 22, 2010
@00:23I think I feel the same way about the movie, but your part fit in very nicely. Well done!
Reply
:iconhaffri:
haffri Featured By Owner Nov 17, 2010
@00:23Thank you :)
Do you mean that you agree that this film wasn't very good? Do you? I haven't found single person online saying this film wasn't gorgeous.
Reply
Add a Comment: